Владимир Рожанковский, бизнес то хороший, только почему он должен стоить 10 прибылей, когда сбер стоит меньше 4 прибылей и у Сбера прибыль р...
Тредер, У нас, умников, конечно, гораздо больше свободного времени, чтобы хотя бы как минимум задать этот вопрос любому ИИ, чем у вас, практиков.
### 🛒 Why Food Retail Stocks Trade at Higher Multiples
— **Stable, Recurring Demand**
People don’t stop buying groceries—even in recessions. Food retail benefits from consistent consumer demand, which gives investors confidence in future revenue streams. That stability often commands a premium.
— **Low Credit Risk**
Unlike banks, food retailers aren’t exposed to loan defaults or interest rate shocks. Their earnings are less cyclical and less vulnerable to macroeconomic stress, making them “safer” in volatile environments.
— **Asset-Light and Scalable Models**
Many modern food retailers (especially online or hybrid formats) operate with lean inventories and tech-driven logistics. This scalability can lead to higher margins and growth potential, justifying higher P/S ratios.
— **Valuation Anchored in Brand and Foot Traffic**
Retailers like Costco, Walmart, or Seven & i Holdings trade on their ability to drive foot traffic, upsell essentials, and maintain pricing power. These qualitative strengths often inflate valuation multiples beyond raw earnings.
---
### 🏦 Why Banks Trade at Lower Multiples
— **Heavy Regulation and Capital Requirements**
Banks must hold large capital buffers and comply with strict regulations. This limits their ability to grow aggressively and depresses return on equity—dragging down P/E ratios.
— **Interest Rate Sensitivity**
Banking profits swing with rate cycles. In low-rate environments, net interest margins shrink. In high-rate periods, credit risk rises. This volatility makes investors cautious.
— **Opaque Risk Exposure**
Loan books, derivatives, and off-balance-sheet items make banks harder to value. Investors often apply a discount to account for hidden risks.
— **Lower Revenue Multiples**
Banks generate revenue through interest and fees, which are less scalable than retail’s product-based sales. Hence, lower P/S ratios.
---
### 🧮 Example
Compare **Walmart** (P/E ~25, P/S ~0.8) with **JPMorgan Chase** (P/E ~9, P/S ~2.5). Despite JPMorgan’s higher revenue per share, its earnings are discounted due to regulatory drag and credit risk. Walmart’s valuation reflects its defensive nature and predictable cash flow.

Финаме
БКС Мир Инвестиций