Список проголосовавших за комментарий "Paradox of leaders and slaves<br/> <br/> Messages of leading authorities are not important and people may not understand<br/> but messages of led people are more important and authorities are obliged to understand<br/> <br/> Authorities are obliged to prove their point of view<br/> but people are not obliged to prove anything<br/> what accelerates receipt of information by authorities from people<br/> <br/> It is useful for authorities to read forums of people and within government<br/> higher leaders are obliged to listen to lower wingmen<br/> <br/> Person leading is obliged to listen to slaves more attentively<br/> at same time getting more information for future for free<br/> and leader should be interested in discussing slaves<br/> <br/> An organization expressing its opinion is obliged to prove<br/> but people who apply do not have to prove anything<br/> <br/> Practically organization communicates opinion of many participants<br/> therefore a power of attorney from people<br/> or a power of attorney from higher authorities is required<br/> <br/> Consequence: who determines power of understanding who is more important to listen to<br/> <br/> Explanation: deputies and governors and mayors and ministers<br/> 99% say memorized but common people say 99% new<br/> plus lower ones exceed higher ones quantitatively<br/> and information of lower ones is newer<br/> <br/> Presenter justifies opinion<br/> but slave expresses an unprovable opinion<br/> <br/> Visualization: a pyramid where horizontal layers<br/> represent qualitative difference of people today<br/> <br/> Example: Governor and Mayor<br/> Information from governor is not important for mayor<br/> but mayor's information is more important for governor<br/> and integral of information from mayors of cities is more far-sighted<br/> <br/> Example: mayor and people<br/> Information from mayor is not important for people<br/> but information of people is more important for mayor<br/> and integral of information from people is more far-sighted<br/> <br/> Paradox: lower ones turn out to be leading<br/> but higher ones turn out to be led"