Список проголосовавших за комментарий "<p>Мольберт Чебурага, The legal system in the United States does not permit the reversal of burden of proof for cases of illicit enrichment. There is a presumption of innocence for the accused required under the US Constitution. However, there has been an adoption of other statutes to target public officials who have profited from illicit gains. For example, the Ethics in Government Act48requires employees of the executive, legislativeand judicial branches to file financial disclosure reports which can then be used as evidence to pursue cases and confiscate these proceeds.49As with Australia, the country has a difference in thresholds for criminal and civil proceedings. Criminal confiscation can only occur once there has been a conviction. In civil cases, once the prosecution demonstrates that <strong>there is probable cause to bring a case, then the defence must show that the property or assets in question were legally acquired.</strong></p><p><a href="/r.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.transparency.org%2Ffiles%2Fcontent%2Fcorruptionqas%2FHelpdesk_answer_illicit_enrichment.pdf&s=4123862097">www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/Helpdesk_answer_illicit